In Jon Gertner’s article “True Innovation,” he states the
importance of being innovative by introducing Bell lab as an example. First, he
said that Bell lab did a great job in innovation. Second, he gave us a successful
example of Mervin Kelly, who is in charge of the innovative activities in the
lab. In a conclusion, he made a comparison between Bell and some other
commercial companies.
Personally, I agree with what Mervin believes. I think that
is what innovation all about and that’s a good way for a company to do
innovation work. The things or concept he insists are: architectural,
aspirational, and organizational. These are the basic idea for a company to go
well. If it doesn’t have any architectural stuff, there is no basement for the
innovation to set. If there are no aspirational there won’t be any ideas come
up. And also, if there is no organizational order for people to follow, too
much innovation element won’t get well connected and well used.
I think, this philosophy work for most of the companies. Mostly
technology company with great competitions would need this kind of qualities to
support them to organize all the things.
I think the way Bell Lab works is good for geniuses who can make themselves focus on a certain target, but for common, we have to be more restricted.
ReplyDeleteour life is full of innovation. only innovation can open a door for a charming future.
ReplyDelete